Friday, May 06, 2011

One Movie to See and Another to Skip (No. 45)

This is a special "close call" installment.  Both of these classic vampire movies could probably go either way pretty easily as they were both good films with some minor problems that pushed them one way or the other.  While both movies are watchable, these particular versions left a lot to be desired...

Movie to See: Nosferatu - The Gothic Industrial Mix







There is a reason that Nosferatu is as famous and well loved as it is; it is about as creepy a version of the Dracula story as there is! Nosferatu and all of his minions are just... well, creepy. Of course, in my personal opinion, I find Renfield the scariest looking guy in the film. Sure, Nosferatu (even "disguised" as an eccentric lord), is bat-like and monstrous with his pointy ears, fingers and ever present fangs. But Renfield just has this maniacal air about him that you just can't shake -- probably the actual inspiration for Charlie Manson's look... Nosferatu is a great story, a great movie for its time, and is something that all horror and vampire movie enthusiasts will probably enjoy. If you've never seen it, you MUST take the time to do so. This particular version, however, leaves a little to be desired... 
  
First off, I didn't buy into the "Gothic industrial mix" element of this movie. The music wasn't well timed to the movie, which was disappointing. It also didn't feel very Gothic... or industrial for that matter. In fact, I thought it actually sounded more like an Enigma rip off! Frankly, the title to this movie is a lie. 
  
But the worse sin was the poor quality of the film. There are several versions of this film that have been cleaned up and are enjoyable to watch. This wasn't one of them. Scratchy, dingy, and lots of visual fragments; this was not a very high quality version of Nosferatu. Seems to me that if you're going to skimp on the audio, you might as well shell out for a decent visual. Apparently the film makers on this one disagree. 
  
The truth of this film is that an Enigma-want-to-be group put together a mediocre album and were unable to sell it. They thought the crap quality of the music might be forgiven if they could tie it to a classic movie... and then bought a bargain basement version of the film to pair with it... poorly. I can't give this film the two stars (or less) that it deserves because the movie itself is actually very good... despite the quality. But you may be better off putting in a different soundtrack and watching this one with the volume turned down. If you can do that, then this movie is worth a watch -- especially if you've never seen it.







Movie to Skip: Vampyr







Watching really old movies can be an interesting experience. This one is an odd blend of several different elements that demonstrate the timing of its filming and release in conjunction with cinematic technology. For instance, coming right off the tail of the silent movie era, Vampyr utilizes such minimal dialogue that you forget that you're not watching a silent movie. Further, the reliance on music to tell the tale and set the mood (both of which were very well done), means that the score was just as loud (if not louder) than anything spoken in the film. Further, because of the need for it in silent films, this one still makes use of textual exposition slides inserted in the movie. Instead of having an actor tell us that he is confused as to why some odd guy just walked into his hotel room and left an envelope on the side table, you see the actor get up, go to the table with a confused look, and then up pops:
"What was going on? Which horrifying secret was revealing itself? One thing became clear to Allan Gray. a human soul in fear of Death cried for help - and an inner voice ordered him to follow its call."
I mean come on. How crazy is that? Right? And we'll just not go into the letterbox subtitles. Clearly someone thought they were being clever by using a large "Old English" style of font in order to match the text of the exposition slides. Unfortunately, the subtitles are blocky and are SO BIG that they block out half the action of the film going on behind them. Very poor. (And speaking of poor, I'm not sure that a lower quality version of this film exists -- the fragments and scratches were really really heavy and the dvd could have used some serious remastering.)
  
But oddities like those aside (which sometimes added a bit of charm to the film), there were some very interesting elements to this film that were genuinely creepy. In particular, the way shadows have a will of their own (quite literally!) is fascinating. The music and 'darkness' of the film set a great atmosphere, which goes well with the oddities that our hero is constantly stumbling over. All characters seem to glide out of the shadows when coming onto screen, and you are left with a sense that no one is to be trusted and that something truly sinister is going on...even though we're just begging for the director to tell us what it is. This may have been a product 1932, but Dreyer sure knew how to set up a scene! 
  
Yeah, I can see why this film did poorly when it was released -- it's more of a psychological thriller rather than a "true" horror movie (whatever that means for something from the 30's). And yeah, I can see why people find this particular release of the film to be a bit of a stinker too (see the first paragraph), but I do get the sense that somewhere there is a version of this film that everyone should see. Just maybe not the version available for download at Netflix... There is a lot of good that can be taken from this work, but this particular version will probably leave you dissatisfied. With a little more time in the editing bay, perhaps this one could have earned another full star. But without more work, I can't quite recommend this one.